04 Aug In relation to the tender for the award concerning the Taoro Hotel and activity centre, seen the statement and analyzing their contents we have questions that we want to clarify. The main problem is that has been considered that the subject of the contract is a right to lease, rather than an administrative concession and this while should have been doubts as to this end throughout the bidding process, as a few paragraphs speaks of the “rent” – own lease – while in others the “barrel” – applicable to concessions. In any case, the right of the tenant is not likely to be mortgaged, as opposed to the right of the dealer, that if that is likely to be mortgaged in accordance with articles 109 of the mortgage law and 175 of its rules of procedure, which means that if it’s a rental contract is root to deny any possibility of mortgage financing and forcing the contractor to invest own funds in the total amount demanded + 20 K€. Important to know the final date of delivery of the specifications for the tender, if as has been informed we will lengthen one month more.
The tender of the Taoro Hotel and adjoining plot is made for the lease of an asset of patrimonial nature (not in the public domain that would be subject to administrative concession). The concept of lease canon comes from provisions of article 92.2 of the local entities of goods regulations, which legally does not detract its configuration as heritage and subject to an annual income. The extension of the deadline for submission of proposals has been agreed by the Council of Government of the Island Council, finding pending their publication in the official bulletin of the province, for general knowledge.